MoreStories Magazine

Monday, April 30, 2012

test here is the story

and here is the story.


http://www.windsweptpress.com/Casca Trek.docx
Posted by Dave at 8:38 PM No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Newer Posts Older Posts Home
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)

Weather

Weather Forecast | Weather Maps | Weather Radar | Hurricane Center

Story

By GARY GUTTING

February 6, 2013




"What we call psychiatric practice,” he says, “is a certain moral tactic . . . covered over by the myths of positivism.”
- Michael Foucault

 
I’ve recently been following the controversies about revisions to the psychiatric definition of depression.  I’ve also been teaching a graduate seminar on Michel Foucault, beginning with a reading of his “History of Madness.”   This massive volume tries to discover the origins of modern psychiatric practice and raises questions about its meaning and validity.  The debate over depression is an excellent test case for Foucault’s critique.

At the center of that critique is Foucault’s claim that modern psychiatry, while purporting to be grounded in scientific truths, is primarily a system of moral judgments. “What we call psychiatric practice,” he says, “is a certain moral tactic . . . covered over by the myths of positivism.”  Indeed, what psychiatry presents as the “liberation of the mad” (from mental illness) is in fact a “gigantic moral imprisonment.”

Foucault may well be letting his rhetoric outstrip the truth, but his essential point requires serious consideration.  Psychiatric practice does seem to be based on implicit moral assumptions in addition to explicit empirical considerations, and efforts to treat mental illness can be society’s way of controlling what it views as immoral (or otherwise undesirable) behavior. Not long ago, homosexuals and women who rejected their stereotypical roles were judged “mentally ill,” and there’s no guarantee that even today psychiatry is free of similarly dubious judgments.   Much later, in a more subdued tone, Foucault said that the point of his social critiques was “not that everything is bad but that everything is dangerous.”  We can best take his critique of psychiatry in this moderated sense.

Continue at:

http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/02/06/the-limits-of-psychiatry/







Followers

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2012 (11)
    • ▼  April (1)
      • test here is the story
    • ►  February (10)
Travel theme. Theme images by mskowronek. Powered by Blogger.